What our Solana calls actually did, misses included

Finding runners earlyGoing deeper5 min readOctober 3, 2026

Anyone can publish the calls that worked. This page is the ledger of all of them: every Solana call PumpPill logged since January 2026, measured forward from the market cap at the moment we logged it, with the ones that went nowhere counted. The question it answers is plain. If you had seen every call we logged, what would you have seen happen next?

How we count

A call is a token a caller posted or one of our scrapers surfaced, logged with its market cap at that moment. That market cap is the entry. The peak is the highest market-cap reading we recorded afterwards. A token that ran before we logged it gets no credit for that run.

Two tags matter. A stored figure comes from a peak column in our database and has not been re-checked. A proven figure has two or more of our own readings after the call within 30% of the peak. Our proof readings for Solana start on 26 September 2026, so anything older rests on stored peaks, and we say so.

The first version of this page quoted a ninety-day set measured by a price reader that took the biggest pool as the token's price. On 2 October 2026 we found that a painted pool could fool that reader, and we withdrew every figure that rested on it. The numbers below are the re-measured set.

The distribution

Between 27 January and 3 October 2026 we logged 40,415 Solana calls. As recorded in our logs, 8,416 (20.8%) reached 2x after we logged them, 2,556 (6.3%) reached 5x, 1,048 (2.6%) reached 10x, and 138 (0.34%) reached 50x. Against that, 21,583 (53.4%) never got 10% above entry.

One call in five doubled. One in forty went 10x. More than half went flat or down. The 50x row is a stored count and we quote it only as recorded: 78 of those 138 have no post-call readings of our own.

How fast the runners ran

Since 26 September 2026, 47 of our Solana calls reached 10x, and 43 of those peaks are proven. They hit their peak reading a median 4.1 hours after the call: 15% inside the first hour, 57% inside six hours, 91% inside a day. As recorded across all time, the 10x line was crossed a median 3.9 hours after the call (n 815), 76% inside a day, 97% inside a week.

The money, when there was money, was in the first hours. A call you read the next morning had, nine times in ten, already peaked.

What separated the runners at entry

Size did not. As recorded, the calls that went 10x to 50x (n 910) entered at a median market cap of $45,842; the calls that went flat or down (n 21,583) entered at $50,000; all calls (n 40,415) at $47,300. The 43 proven 10x calls since 26 September entered larger, at a median $77,600, with quartiles from $57,400 to $101,335. A small market cap meant a trade of any size would move the price. It did not mean the token was early.

Who posted it did. As recorded, calls whose poster had 100K or more followers at the time (n 1,250) reached 2x 35.0% of the time and 10x 5.6%. Calls with no poster or follower count recorded (n 27,502), most of them from trending scrapers, reached 2x 16.5% and 10x 1.9%. Our Alpha source (n 875) ran 43.4% and 9.6%. Poster size and source are tangled in those rows, and two of every three calls in the best cell still failed to double.

The first scan did too. Our bundle scans ran a median 0.4 minutes after we first saw each token. As recorded, calls with a confirmed bundle at entry (n 2,567) reached 2x 14.4% of the time and 10x 1.7%, with 62.5% flat or down. Calls with no bundle found (n 4,102) reached 2x 24.3% and 10x 3.1%, with 49.7% flat or down. Half the no-bundle calls still went nowhere.

What happened afterwards

Of 917 Solana calls that reached 10x and are now more than thirty days old, 420 (45.8%) were still above entry at our last look, and the median one sat at 3.7% of its peak. Most runners round-trip. Being right about the token and getting paid for it are two separate events, and the second depends on the sale.

We have one measured answer on selling, and it comes from Robinhood Chain rather than Solana. On our paper book's Momentum lane (n 83, 29 September to 2 October 2026, one-minute stored prices), selling everything at +30% with a -25% stop returned -1.7% per trade even though 54% of trades hit the target. Selling half at +20% and trailing the rest 20% below its high returned +19.9% per trade, and +0.5% without the best three. The exits lesson in this track has the detail. The point carries across chains: a fixed target sells the runner that pays for the losers.

Where the ledger is

The Every call table at /tables lists each call from the last thirty days with what it did next, misses kept in. On Solana the rows are the momentum alerts we sent to Premium, recorded at send time, and the outcome is measured forward from the market cap in the alert. The summary line above the table gives counts, never rates. Any contract pasted into the Scanner returns the stored read we hold, with its time stamp. When you want to act on a call, the Buy button on the row opens @PumpPill_Trade_Bot with the contract loaded.

What this does not tell you

A base rate describes forty thousand calls. The call in front of you is one token, and nothing above predicts it.

Entry is the market cap when we logged the call, often minutes after the poster's. A peak is a reading, and a thin pool cannot pay a sale at the top.

The proven set is 43 calls from one week. The paper book is 83 trades from four days on another chain. Both will move.

Our logs hold what callers and scrapers surfaced. A token nobody mentioned is not in the denominator, and the trending scrapers that supply most rows carry no poster, which is why the poster figures are tangled with source.

What to do next

Open /tables, switch to Every call on Solana, and read the summary line before you open a single row. Then pick one call that doubled and one that went flat, and read both receipts: entry, time stamp, peak after.

Try it on a live token

The lesson is the method. The product is where you apply it.

Open the Trade Bot