First logged · last seen trading
- Market cap
- $71.7K
- 100% of $71.7K peak
- Liquidity
- $21.3K
- 30% of market cap
- Top 10 hold
- 44.7%
- pools left out
- First logged at
- $90.7K
- 1 Oct, 21:37 UTC
- Since then
- 0.8x
- at its peak
- Logged
- 37 h ago
- Trading
Am I early?
Partly. It is 0.8x from where we first logged it, 37 h ago.
- 0.8xfrom $90.7K, where we first logged it 37 h ago.
- 100%of its $71.7K peak.
- 4/7launch wallets bought as one group.
What's my risk?
High. The contract is clean; the people behind the launch have a rug record.
Nobody can create more of it or freeze your wallet, 67% of the liquidity is locked.
Top 10 wallets hold 44.7%.
RugCheck links 6 of its holder wallets to each other.
4 of the 7 launch wallets bought as one group: 4 buying in the same slot, 3 paying identical minimum fees.
This is the creator wallet's (HL7q…nUmg) only launch (GMGN's count).
The wallet that funded launch buyers here funded earlier rugs too (they peaked around $164K).
A wallet in this launch has funded 139 earlier rugs.
$21.3K of liquidity, 30% of the market cap.
Bundle
Did insiders load the launch, and are they still in?
7 wallets bought in the first 6 seconds. 4 of them bought as one group: 4 buying in the same slot, 3 paying identical minimum fees. Whether they still hold it has not been read.
4/7
launch wallets bought as one group
4.3 SOL
spent by the 7 launch wallets
| Launch wallet | After launch | Spent |
|---|---|---|
| HL7q…nUmgcreator | 0 s | 3.62 SOL |
| 3e5U…vxVe | 0 s | 0.05 SOL |
| 49KE…NvDZseen in 14 earlier rugs | 0 s | 0.002 SOL |
| FbzG…9Dk5seen in 3 earlier rugs | 0 s | 0.002 SOL |
| BotV…dBot | 1 s | 0.005 SOL |
| f2r7…Axw4 | 2 s | 0.61 SOL |
| 7mfp…nyVdseen in 1 earlier rugs | 6 s | 0.002 SOL |
Shared funder: Axio…Ubnc paid more than one of these wallets.
Launch read 1 Oct, 21:38 UTC. We read who bought, not what each still holds.
Holders
Who holds it now?
It's fairly concentrated. The top 10 wallets hold 44.7% between them, with pools left out (67.6% counting them).
44.7%
held by the top 10 wallets
6
holder wallets RugCheck links to each other
Pools are not people, so the top 10 leaves them out.
Early money & smart money
Is smart money in?
2 funder wallets we track paid launch wallets here; the same wallet funded earlier rugs.
Evidence
Can the contract trap me?
Nothing in the contract lets the dev print more, freeze you or pull the pool.
Mint authority revoked
Freeze authority revoked
Liquidity 67% locked
GMGN: community takeover — the original creator left
GMGN: 14 smart-money wallets and 1 well-known trader among the wallets that traded it
Every launch read, with what it found (7)
Same funder as prior rug(s): AxiomRYA... 0.0% supply, 0.0 SOL invested, prior rugs peaked ~$164K
Same-slot buys detected: 4/7 buyers, 0.0% supply, 3.7 SOL, entered 0.0s after launch
Uniform minimum fees: 3 wallets paying identical minimum fees — programmatic bundle
Funding unresolved: 5/7 wallets
Wallet(s) funded 139 prior rug(s) (PumpPill-verified): 2 wallet(s)
Same funder wallet linked to prior token(s) — 72 prior token(s), best peaked ~$50,000,000 (high-runway funder).
Known scam promoter flagged by X-Scan: Wallet recycling: 2 wallet(s): funded 139 prior rug(s)
Deeper reads· beta
Is money arriving or leaving?
Still being tuned. Read the sections above first.
No flow read in the last two hours.
Get the next call on Telegram — every alert, 30 minutes after members. The moment it fires, $99 a month.
Every time we logged it (5)
- 10:03 PMupdate (3.1x)$71.7K
- 9:43 PMupdate (88%+)$12.7K
- 9:42 PMupdate (2.0x)$183.0K
- 9:39 PMfirst seen$88.9K
- 9:37 PMfirst seen$90.7K
Check another one
Paste any contract address on Solana or Robinhood Chain.
Socials & X
Who's talking about it?
1 account posted the contract in its own words:
10 repeat-poster accounts. Posted between 1 Oct 21:40 and 00:10 UTC:
3 more accounts posted it as vote-farm copy: @crysthrnsETH, @PixelParadoxHQ, @f0ldfrntsETH.
1 more account named the ticker without the contract, so it is not counted.
Record = how that account's earlier calls went; “none yet” until it has enough scored calls. Who posts is attention, not a reason to buy.
We search X for the full contract address, never the ticker, and sample it: a post we did not see is not proof nobody posted it.