Is @liuxingeth legit? Memecoin call track record
0 of 9 coins @liuxingeth called reached 5x after the post. Verdict: Avoid.
Last read from X 10/6/2026: 118 posts, 0 contracts, 22 $tickers.
Calls found by reading their X posts (0 of 9 hit 5x)
Tokens our scanners never saw, measured from the price when the post went up (the higher of that hour's open and close) to the highest price after it. "Now" and "A week later" are the price then against the price at the post: what a follower actually got. "Late" means the coin had already run 5x or more before the post. "By ticker" means the post named a $TICKER, not a contract: we matched it to the biggest coin with that exact ticker that already existed when the post went up. That is our best guess, not proof.
| $PIPEDOGby ticker | Oct 5 | $16.9M | $16.9M | 1.0x | 1.0x | — |
| $NEEGYby ticker | Oct 5 | $95K | $95K | 1.0x | 0.8x | — |
| $CASHCATby ticker | Oct 4 | $157.2M | $162.9M | 1.0x | 1.0x | — |
| $ANSEMby ticker | Oct 4 | $317.9M | $317.9M | 1.0x | 1.0x | — |
| $SIby ticker | Oct 4 | $42.7M | $43.5M | 1.0x | 0.6x | — |
| $CATEby ticker | Oct 4 | $74.0M | $74.0M | 1.0x | 1.0x | — |
| $PAIDby ticker | Oct 4 | $6.2M | $6.2M | 1.0x | 0.6x | — |
| $MARSCOINby ticker | Oct 4 | $170.7M | $170.7M | 1.0x | 1.0x | — |
| $PONSby ticker | Oct 3 | $276.6M | $287.8M | 1.0x | 0.9x | — |
Methodology: calls are posts containing the token's contract address; outcomes measured from PumpPill's first scan to peak market cap, or, for tokens we never scanned, from the price when the post went up to the highest price after it. A low hit rate is a statistical observation, not an accusation of wrongdoing. Think a call on this page is wrong, or this is your account and a post was misread? Email [email protected] with the handle and the coin; we re-check from the chart.