First logged · last seen trading
- Market cap
- $26.1K
- 41% of $63.3K peak
- Liquidity
- $15.0K
- 57% of market cap
- Top 10 hold
- 45.9%
- pools left out
- First logged at
- $93.9K
- 6 Oct, 15:54 UTC
- Since then
- 0.3x
- 59% off the peak
- Logged
- 2 d ago
- Trading
Am I early?
No. It already ran to $63.3K and gave back 59%.
- 0.3xfrom $93.9K, where we first logged it 2 d ago.
- 41%of its $63.3K peak.
- 29/32launch wallets bought as one group.
What's my risk?
High. The contract is clean; the people behind the launch have a rug record.
Nobody can create more of it or freeze your wallet, 100% of the liquidity is locked.
Top 10 wallets hold 45.9%.
RugCheck links 8 of its holder wallets to each other.
29 of the 32 launch wallets bought as one group: 7 buying in the same slot, 25 paying identical minimum fees.
This is the creator wallet's (9Urm…GAwC) only launch (GMGN's count).
The wallet that funded launch buyers here funded earlier rugs too (they peaked around $99K).
A wallet in this launch has funded 130 earlier rugs.
$15.0K of liquidity, 57% of the market cap.
Bundle
Did insiders load the launch, and are they still in?
32 wallets bought in the first 23 seconds. 29 of them bought as one group: 7 buying in the same slot, 25 paying identical minimum fees, 6 sending sale proceeds to one wallet. Whether they still hold it has not been read.
29/32
launch wallets bought as one group
20.5 SOL
spent by the 32 launch wallets
| Launch wallet | After launch | Spent |
|---|---|---|
| 9Urm…GAwCcreator | 0 s | 0.12 SOL |
| 8Fux…ejwkseen in 25 earlier rugs | 2 s | 0.95 SOL |
| HxCm…imSX | 2 s | 0.05 SOL |
| 6bca…Tz9G | 3 s | 1.68 SOL |
| 7nF7…vmvL | 3 s | 1.44 SOL |
| F5uF…Z1eq | 3 s | 1.62 SOL |
| CdsS…T79H | 4 s | 1.15 SOL |
| ERLB…yUNm | 5 s | 0.29 SOL |
Shared funder: Axio…TTSk paid more than one of these wallets.
Launch read 6 Oct, 15:56 UTC. We read who bought, not what each still holds.
Holders
Who holds it now?
It's fairly concentrated. The top 10 wallets hold 45.9% between them, with pools left out (74.4% counting them).
45.9%
held by the top 10 wallets
8
holder wallets RugCheck links to each other
Pools are not people, so the top 10 leaves them out.
Early money & smart money
Is smart money in?
3 funder wallets we track paid launch wallets here; the same wallet funded earlier rugs.
Evidence
Can the contract trap me?
Nothing in the contract lets the dev print more, freeze you or pull the pool.
Mint authority revoked
Freeze authority revoked
Liquidity 100% locked
GMGN: 36 smart-money wallets and 4 well-known traders among the wallets that traded it
Every launch read, with what it found (8)
Same funder as prior rug(s): AxiomRXZ... 0.0% supply, 1.0 SOL invested, prior rugs peaked ~$99K
Same-slot buys detected: 7/32 buyers, 0.0% supply, 17.6 SOL, entered 3.0s after launch
Closed-loop proceeds hub: 6 cluster wallets routed sell proceeds to 2ApLdw…K8s7 (~0.118 SOL) — one operator behind 'independent' wallets
Uniform minimum fees: 25 wallets paying identical minimum fees — programmatic bundle
Funding unresolved: 28/32 wallets
Wallet(s) funded 130 prior rug(s) (PumpPill-verified): 3 wallet(s)
Same funder wallet linked to prior token(s) — 79 prior token(s), best peaked ~$13,011,731 (high-runway funder).
Known scam promoter flagged by X-Scan: Wallet recycling: 3 wallet(s): funded 130 prior rug(s)
Deeper reads· beta
Is money arriving or leaving?
Still being tuned. Read the sections above first.
No flow read in the last two hours.
Get the next call on Telegram — every alert, 30 minutes after members. The moment it fires, $99 a month.
Every time we logged it (3)
- 3:55 PMfirst seen$26.1K
- 3:54 PMfirst seen$89.5K
- 3:54 PMfirst seen$93.9K
Check another one
Paste any contract address on Solana or Robinhood Chain.
Socials & X
Who's talking about it?
4 accounts posted the contract in their own words:
10 repeat-poster accounts. Posted between 6 Oct 15:40 and 6 Oct 16:31 UTC:
Record = how that account's earlier calls went; “none yet” until it has enough scored calls. Who posts is attention, not a reason to buy.
We search X for the full contract address, never the ticker, and sample it: a post we did not see is not proof nobody posted it.