$The Bull
Solana
First logged · last seen trading
- Market cap
- $2.8K
- 6% of $49.0K peak
- Liquidity
- $2.9K
- 104% of market cap
- Top 10 hold
- 36.9%
- pools left out
- First logged at
- $76.6K
- 5 Oct, 04:48 UTC
- Since then
- 0.0x
- 94% off the peak
- Logged
- 7 h ago
- Stopped trading
Am I early?
No. It already ran to $49.0K and gave back 94%.
- 0.0xfrom $76.6K, where we first logged it 7 h ago.
- 6%of its $49.0K peak.
- 10/10launch wallets bought as one group, and they are selling.
What's my risk?
High. The contract is clean; the people behind the launch have a rug record.
Nobody can create more of it or freeze your wallet, 100% of the liquidity is locked.
Top 10 wallets hold 36.9%.
RugCheck links 15 of its holder wallets to each other.
10 of the 10 launch wallets bought as one group: 7 buying in the same slot, 3 paying identical minimum fees.
The creator wallet (DJQw…dHK2) has launched 3,380 tokens counting this one (GMGN's count), 57 of them graduated. We saw 32 earlier launches ourselves; we counted 13 of them as rugs. Its best token reached $3.69M ($DOG).
The wallet that funded launch buyers here funded earlier rugs too (they peaked around $57K).
A wallet in this launch has bought into 63 earlier rug networks.
$2.9K of liquidity, 104% of the market cap.
Found 1 scam account(s).
Bundle
Did insiders load the launch, and are they still in?
10 wallets bought in the first 1 second. 10 of them bought as one group: 7 buying in the same slot, 3 paying identical minimum fees, 5 sending sale proceeds to one wallet. They have sold 100% of what they bought.
10/10
launch wallets bought as one group
10.2 SOL
spent by the 10 launch wallets
0.0%
of supply still held by the group
| Launch wallet | After launch | Spent |
|---|---|---|
| DJQw…dHK2creatorseen in 12 earlier rugs | 0 s | 3.04 SOL |
| 7cWp…oEy8seen in 29 earlier rugs | 0 s | 2.40 SOL |
| AaNm…Z2JZseen in 28 earlier rugs | 0 s | 2.50 SOL |
| 3uuG…Gckwseen in 19 earlier rugs | 0 s | 2.10 SOL |
| EN99…2kb5seen in 479 earlier rugs | 0 s | 0.003 SOL |
| dKWn…zzC4 | 0 s | 0.15 SOL |
| 3crj…fhgSseen in 1202 earlier rugs | 0 s | 0.01 SOL |
| J137…Qa4Zseen in 965 earlier rugs | 1 s | 0.001 SOL |
Shared funder: 92XE…deej paid more than one of these wallets.
Launch read 5 Oct, 04:49 UTC. We read who bought, not what each still holds.
Holders
Who holds it now?
It's fairly concentrated. The top 10 wallets hold 36.9% between them.
36.9%
held by the top 10 wallets
0.0%
held by the creator's wallet
15
holder wallets RugCheck links to each other
Pools are not people, so the top 10 leaves them out.
Early money & smart money
Is smart money in?
A funder wallet we track paid launch wallets here.
Tracked funderA funder wallet we track paid launch wallets here. BfKH…Ahe1
Checked against the whales, early funders and caller wallets we track. A wallet we do not track can still be in it.
Evidence
Can the contract trap me?
Nothing in the contract lets the dev print more, freeze you or pull the pool.
Mint authority revoked
Freeze authority revoked
Liquidity 100% locked
GMGN: community takeover — the original creator left
GMGN: 16 smart-money wallets and 2 well-known traders among the wallets that traded it
GMGN saw the launch bundlers selling at $65.9K market cap, 6 h ago
Every launch read, with what it found (17)
Same funder as prior rug(s): 92XEuaWS... 9.0% supply, 3.0 SOL invested, breakeven ~34 SOL MC, prior rugs peaked ~$57K
Coordinated buys: 1 shared funder(s)
Same-slot buys detected: 7/10 buyers, 25.1% supply, 10.2 SOL, entered 0.0s after launch
Closed-loop proceeds hub: 5 cluster wallets routed sell proceeds to 5Siz5Y…Pshz (~6.366 SOL) — one operator behind 'independent' wallets
Round-number funding: 3 wallet(s) funded with clean round SOL amounts — desk/treasury disbursement pattern
Identical funding amounts: 3 wallets received identical amounts (0.751 SOL)
Layered funding detected: Funder 92XEuaWS... funded by upstream AxiomRXZ... (2-hop chain)
Layered funding detected: Funder BfKHhnkV... funded by upstream DJQwBSHs... (2-hop chain)
Uniform minimum fees: 3 wallets paying identical minimum fees — programmatic bundle
Funding unresolved: 6/10 wallets
Single funder controls significant supply: BfKHhnkV... holds 15.8% supply via 3 buyer(s)
Funder profits at low MC: 92XEuaWS... breakeven ~34 SOL MC (9.0% supply, 3.0 SOL invested)
Bundle is trapped — selling would crash price: BfKHhnkV... holds 15.8% supply. Selling drops price ~18%.
Wallet(s) bundled into 63 prior rug network(s) (PumpPill-verified): 2 wallet(s)
Same funder wallet linked to prior token(s) — 59 prior token(s), best peaked ~$164,955 (low-runway funder).
Scam wallet flagged BUT Trapped/Stuck — reduced risk: Pushed by actors with @bymotionn (established pattern of 24 rug(s)); Wallet recycling: 2 wallet(s): bundled into 63 prior rug network(s)
All wallets <1 day old — disposable rug infrastructure
Deeper reads· beta
Could the launch group get out?
Still being tuned. Read the sections above first.
The launch group is trapped: selling would crash their own exit.
No flow read in the last two hours.
Get the next call on Telegram — every alert, 30 minutes after members. The moment it fires, $99 a month.
What we sent on it
- Alpha signal at $76.6K · Oct 5, 2026, 4:48 AM0.0x now
Each line is a Telegram alert. A multiple under 1 is a loss and stays on the list.
Check another one
Paste any contract address on Solana or Robinhood Chain.
Socials & X
Who's talking about it?
10 repeat-poster accounts. Posted between 5 Oct 04:41 and 5 Oct 05:49 UTC:
Record = how that account's earlier calls went; “none yet” until it has enough scored calls. Who posts is attention, not a reason to buy.
We search X for the full contract address, never the ticker, and sample it: a post we did not see is not proof nobody posted it.