$Pushing P
Solana
First logged · last seen trading
- Market cap
- $1.5K
- 16% of $9.4K peak
- Liquidity
- $1.6K
- 106% of market cap
- Top 10 hold
- 42.4%
- pools left out
- First logged at
- $32.1K
- 14 Aug, 23:07 UTC
- Since then
- 0.0x
- 84% off the peak
- Logged
- 50 d ago
- Stopped trading
Am I early?
No. It was not trading in any size when we stopped tracking it, 49 d ago.
- 0.0xfrom $32.1K, where we first logged it 50 d ago, to $1.5K at our last look, 49 d ago.
- 16%of its $9.4K peak at our last look.
- 43/43launch wallets bought as one group, and they are selling.
What's my risk?
High. The contract is clean; the people behind the launch have a rug record.
Nobody can create more of it or freeze your wallet. Not read: the liquidity lock.
Top 10 wallets hold 42.4%.
RugCheck links 12 of its holder wallets to each other.
43 of the 43 launch wallets bought as one group: 29 buying in the same slot, 34 going through one Jito bundle.
The wallet we read as the creator (97K6…zqK4) has 37 earlier launches on our record; we counted 26 of them as rugs.
The wallet that funded launch buyers here funded earlier rugs too (they peaked around $56K).
A wallet in this launch has bought into 28 earlier rug networks.
$1.6K of liquidity, 106% of the market cap.
Found 1 scam account(s).
Bundle
Did insiders load the launch, and are they still in?
43 wallets bought in the first 5 seconds. 43 of them bought as one group: 29 buying in the same slot, 34 going through one Jito bundle, 17 paying identical minimum fees. They have started selling.
43/43
launch wallets bought as one group
32.5 SOL
spent by the 43 launch wallets
| Launch wallet | After launch | Spent |
|---|---|---|
| 97K6…zqK4creatorseen in 26 earlier rugs | 0 s | 5.07 SOL |
| EZJH…ZWQfseen in 1 earlier rugs | 0 s | 0.74 SOL |
| 72Dy…FkABseen in 4 earlier rugs | 0 s | 1.42 SOL |
| HN1w…fjCq | 0 s | 0.76 SOL |
| 4sWP…H6MWseen in 4866 earlier rugs | 0 s | 0.001 SOL |
| H8bg…49bzseen in 31 earlier rugs | 0 s | 0.52 SOL |
| CkLT…vELrseen in 160 earlier rugs | 0 s | 1.83 SOL |
| 5DC3…wFckseen in 137 earlier rugs | 0 s | 1.97 SOL |
Shared funder: 97K6…zqK4 paid more than one of these wallets.
Launch read 14 Aug, 23:07 UTC. We read who bought, not what each still holds.
Holders
Who holds it now?
It's fairly concentrated. The top 10 wallets hold 42.4% between them.
42.4%
held by the top 10 wallets
0.0%
held by the creator's wallet
12
holder wallets RugCheck links to each other
Pools are not people, so the top 10 leaves them out.
Early money & smart money
Is smart money in?
A funder wallet we track paid launch wallets here; the same wallet funded earlier rugs.
Tracked funderA funder wallet we track paid launch wallets here; the same wallet funded earlier rugs. 97K6…zqK4
Checked against the whales, early funders and caller wallets we track. A wallet we do not track can still be in it.
Evidence
Can the contract trap me?
The contract checks are below, each with what it means for a holder.
Mint authority revoked
Freeze authority revoked
Liquidity lock not read
Every launch read, with what it found (19)
Creator funded early buyers: 3 buyer(s), 6.3% supply, 2.9 SOL, entered 0.0s after launch
Jito bundle confirmed: 34 wallet(s), 52.1% supply, 25.1 SOL, entered 0.0s after launch
Same funder as prior rug(s): 97K6nsFh... 6.3% supply, 2.9 SOL invested, breakeven ~46 SOL MC, prior rugs peaked ~$56K
Coordinated buys: 1 shared funder(s)
Same-slot buys detected: 29/43 buyers, 60.4% supply, 31.1 SOL, entered 0.0s after launch
Bundler dumped into launch: 7 coordinated wallet(s) sold within 5 min: 97K6ns… sold 50%, H8bgvr… sold 100%, CkLT4A… sold 100%, 5DC3tM… sold 100%
Closed-loop proceeds hub: 6 cluster wallets routed sell proceeds to 3uAiJf…m1At (~9.866 SOL) — one operator behind 'independent' wallets
Layered funding detected: Funder 97K6nsFh... funded by upstream BCyNgSB1... (2-hop chain)
Layered funding detected: Funder BCyNgSB1... funded by upstream 97K6nsFh... (2-hop chain)
Multi-wallet atomic buys: 4 sybil wallet(s) received tokens via single-tx multi-buy
Uniform minimum fees: 17 wallets paying identical minimum fees — programmatic bundle
Funding unresolved: 39/43 wallets
Single funder controls significant supply: BCyNgSB1... holds 16.1% supply via 1 buyer(s)
Funder profits at low MC: BCyNgSB1... breakeven ~32 SOL MC (16.1% supply, 5.1 SOL invested)
Bundle is trapped — selling would crash price: BCyNgSB1... holds 16.1% supply. Selling drops price ~16%.
Wallet(s) bundled into 28 prior rug network(s) (RugCheck + PumpPill): 2 wallet(s)
Same funder wallet linked to prior token(s) — 28 prior token(s), best peaked ~$300,886 (short-runway funder).
Scam wallet flagged BUT Trapped/Stuck — reduced risk: Pushed by actors with @nikolaihauckx (established pattern of 24 rug(s)); Wallet recycling: 2 wallet(s): bundled into 28 prior rug network(s)
Coordinated group controls 63% but Trapped/Stuck — aligned incentives
Deeper reads· beta
Could the launch group get out?
Still being tuned. Read the sections above first.
The launch group is trapped: selling would crash their own exit.
No flow read in the last two hours.
Get the next call on Telegram — every alert, 30 minutes after members. The moment it fires, $99 a month.
What we sent on it
- Early detection at $32.1K · Aug 14, 2026, 11:08 PM0.0x now
Each line is a Telegram alert. A multiple under 1 is a loss and stays on the list.
Check another one
Paste any contract address on Solana or Robinhood Chain.
Socials & X
Who's talking about it?
4 accounts posted the contract in their own words:
3 repeat-poster accounts. Posted between 14 Aug 23:02 and 14 Aug 23:07 UTC:
Record = how that account's earlier calls went; “none yet” until it has enough scored calls. Who posts is attention, not a reason to buy.
We search X for the full contract address, never the ticker, and sample it: a post we did not see is not proof nobody posted it.