First logged · last seen trading
- Market cap
- $315K
- 24% of $1.30M peak
- Liquidity
- $42.9K
- 14% of market cap
- Top 10 hold
- 45.0%
- pools left out
- First logged at
- $82.4K
- 8 Aug, 18:22 UTC
- Since then
- 3.8x
- 76% off the peak
- Logged
- 57 d ago
- Stopped trading
Am I early?
No. It was not trading in any size when we stopped tracking it, 57 d ago.
- 3.8xfrom $82.4K, where we first logged it 57 d ago, to $315K at our last look, 57 d ago.
- 24%of its $1.30M peak at our last look.
- 47/47launch wallets bought as one group, and they are selling.
What's my risk?
High. The contract is clean; the people behind the launch have a rug record.
Nobody can create more of it or freeze your wallet. Not read: the liquidity lock.
Top 10 wallets hold 45.0%; the creator's wallet holds 15.3%.
RugCheck links 15 of its holder wallets to each other.
47 of the 47 launch wallets bought as one group: 29 buying in the same slot, 24 going through one Jito bundle.
The creator wallet (GeBJ…DuwR) has launched 386 tokens counting this one (GMGN's count), 142 of them graduated. We saw 64 earlier launches ourselves; we counted 23 of them as rugs. Its best token reached $9.67M ($SAPIJIJU).
$42.9K of liquidity, 14% of the market cap.
Found 1 scam account(s).
Bundle
Did insiders load the launch, and are they still in?
47 wallets bought in the first 4 seconds. 47 of them bought as one group: 29 buying in the same slot, 24 going through one Jito bundle, 23 paying identical minimum fees. They have sold 100% of what they bought.
47/47
launch wallets bought as one group
74.8 SOL
spent by the 47 launch wallets
0.0%
of supply still held by the group
| Launch wallet | After launch | Spent |
|---|---|---|
| GeBJ…DuwRcreatorseen in 23 earlier rugs | 0 s | 20.21 SOL |
| 2mqr…jwdYseen in 200 earlier rugs | 0 s | 6.81 SOL |
| 2CQg…ctFGseen in 1037 earlier rugs | 0 s | 4.20 SOL |
| 5q2W…e98cseen in 8 earlier rugs | 0 s | 2.24 SOL |
| Fyuq…5Jsvseen in 14 earlier rugs | 0 s | 5.12 SOL |
| Anub…HF5wseen in 1501 earlier rugs | 0 s | 3.36 SOL |
| 85Yw…aHrLseen in 194 earlier rugs | 0 s | 3.99 SOL |
| H8UK…FzHmseen in 3796 earlier rugs | 0 s | 0.002 SOL |
Who funded them: unread for 44/47 wallets (fresh wallets we could not trace back).
Launch read 8 Aug, 18:23 UTC. We read who bought, not what each still holds.
Holders
Who holds it now?
It's fairly concentrated. The top 10 wallets hold 45.0% between them.
45.0%
held by the top 10 wallets
15.3%
held by the creator's wallet
15
holder wallets RugCheck links to each other
Pools are not people, so the top 10 leaves them out.
Early money & smart money
Is smart money in?
A funder wallet we track paid launch wallets here.
Tracked funderA funder wallet we track paid launch wallets here. 2APC…mqZM
Checked against the whales, early funders and caller wallets we track. A wallet we do not track can still be in it.
Evidence
Can the contract trap me?
The contract checks are below, each with what it means for a holder.
Mint authority revoked
Freeze authority revoked
Liquidity lock not read
RugCheck: High holder correlation
Every launch read, with what it found (11)
Jito bundle confirmed: 24 wallet(s), 67.4% supply, 49.0 SOL, entered 0.0s after launch
Funder seen bundling before (no confirmed rugs): 2APCzZdW... seen bundling 2 other token(s), 0 confirmed rugs, 3.8% supply here
Same-slot buys detected: 29/47 buyers, 81.8% supply, 74.8 SOL, entered 0.0s after launch
Bundler dumped into launch: 11 coordinated wallet(s) sold within 5 min: 2mqrin… sold 80%, 2CQgjc… sold 40%, FyuqUn… sold 66%, Anubis… sold 100%
Closed-loop proceeds hub: 6 cluster wallets routed sell proceeds to Fb6Q83…TVzK (~16.464 SOL) — one operator behind 'independent' wallets
Uniform minimum fees: 23 wallets paying identical minimum fees — programmatic bundle
Funding unresolved: 44/47 wallets
Single funder controls significant supply: 3tQ3L72d... holds 7.8% supply via 1 buyer(s)
Funder profits at low MC: 3tQ3L72d... breakeven ~87 SOL MC (7.8% supply, 6.8 SOL invested)
Scam wallet flagged BUT Trapped/Stuck — reduced risk: Pushed by actors with @adolfthedev (promoted 13 other rugged tokens)
Coordinated group controls 82% but Trapped/Stuck — aligned incentives
Deeper reads· beta
Could the launch group get out?
Still being tuned. Read the sections above first.
The launch group is trapped: selling would crash their own exit.
No flow read in the last two hours.
Get the next call on Telegram — every alert, 30 minutes after members. The moment it fires, $99 a month.
What we sent on it
- Early detection at $85.0K · Aug 8, 2026, 6:24 PM3.7x now
- Several lanes at once at $264.9K · Aug 8, 2026, 7:18 PM1.2x now
- Revival at $287.3K · Aug 8, 2026, 10:04 PM1.1x now
Each line is a Telegram alert. A multiple under 1 is a loss and stays on the list.
Every time we logged it (19)
- 7:33 PMupdate (24x)$255.3K
- 7:33 PMupdate (40x)$1.6M
- 7:29 PMupdate (14x)$1.2M
- 7:29 PMupdate (30x)$1.2M
- 7:24 PMupdate (10x)$1.1M
- 7:24 PMupdate (20x)$797.0K
- 7:13 PMupdate (7.9x)$541.9K
- 7:13 PMupdate (16x)$636.0K
- 7:08 PMupdate (5.0x)$407.0K
- 7:08 PMupdate (10x)$399.0K
- 6:36 PMupdate (7.2x)$264.9K
- 6:34 PMupdate (3.5x)$280.0K
- 6:34 PMupdate (5.5x)$218.0K
- 6:25 PMupdate (2.2x)$85.7K
- 6:24 PMfirst seen$40.2K
- 6:24 PMfirst seen$95.3K
- 6:23 PMfirst seen$85.0K
- 6:23 PMfirst seen$92.4K
- 6:22 PMfirst seen$82.4K
Check another one
Paste any contract address on Solana or Robinhood Chain.
Socials & X
Who's talking about it?
1 account posted the contract in its own words:
7 repeat-poster accounts. Posted between 8 Aug 17:44 and 8 Aug 19:08 UTC:
1 more account posted it as vote-farm copy: @ShelbyHemstock.
4 more accounts named the ticker without the contract, so they are not counted.
Record = how that account's earlier calls went; “none yet” until it has enough scored calls. Who posts is attention, not a reason to buy.
We search X for the full contract address, never the ticker, and sample it: a post we did not see is not proof nobody posted it.