$Switched Games
Solana
First logged · last seen trading
- Market cap
- $3.7K
- 8% of $44.6K peak
- Liquidity
- $6.9K
- 185% of market cap
- Top 10 hold
- 38.2%
- pools left out
- First logged at
- $54.8K
- 10 Oct, 22:34 UTC
- Since then
- 0.1x
- 92% off the peak
- Logged
- 2 h ago
- Stopped trading
Am I early?
No. It already ran to $44.6K and gave back 92%.
- 0.1xfrom $54.8K, where we first logged it 2 h ago.
- 8%of its $44.6K peak.
- 13/13launch wallets bought as one group.
What's my risk?
High. The contract is clean; its creator's other launches mostly went nowhere.
Nobody can create more of it or freeze your wallet, 100% of the liquidity is locked.
Top 10 wallets hold 38.2%.
RugCheck links 7 of its holder wallets to each other.
13 of the 13 launch wallets bought as one group: 13 buying in the same slot, 5 sending sale proceeds to one wallet.
The creator wallet (41H6…9BQv) has launched 725 tokens counting this one (GMGN's count), 11 of them graduated. Its best token reached $1.89M ($elonmask).
$6.9K of liquidity, 185% of the market cap.
Found 1 scam account(s).
Bundle
Did insiders load the launch, and are they still in?
13 wallets bought in the first 1 second. 13 of them bought as one group: 13 buying in the same slot, 5 sending sale proceeds to one wallet. Whether they still hold it has not been read.
13/13
launch wallets bought as one group
5.8 SOL
spent by the 13 launch wallets
| Launch wallet | After launch | Spent |
|---|---|---|
| 41H6…9BQvcreator | 0 s | 5.13 SOL |
| 447Z…G6pM | 0 s | 0.05 SOL |
| 2Bmx…RTRv | 0 s | 0.13 SOL |
| 3Ksp…WRn6seen in 377 earlier rugs | 0 s | 0.002 SOL |
| 97jv…GRmLseen in 440 earlier rugs | 0 s | 0.34 SOL |
| 2kWz…BoLQ | 0 s | 0.01 SOL |
| ELnq…TdGxseen in 1 earlier rugs | 0 s | 0.15 SOL |
| Buek…zr7useen in 247 earlier rugs | 0 s | 0.01 SOL |
Who funded them: unread for 9/13 wallets (fresh wallets we could not trace back).
Launch read 10 Oct, 22:35 UTC. We read who bought, not what each still holds.
Holders
Who holds it now?
It's fairly concentrated. The top 10 wallets hold 38.2% between them.
38.2%
held by the top 10 wallets
0.0%
held by the creator's wallet
7
holder wallets RugCheck links to each other
Pools are not people, so the top 10 leaves them out.
Early money & smart money
Is smart money in?
2 funder wallets we track paid launch wallets here.
Evidence
Can the contract trap me?
Nothing in the contract lets the dev print more, freeze you or pull the pool.
Mint authority revoked
Freeze authority revoked
Liquidity 100% locked
GMGN: community takeover — the original creator left
GMGN: 37 smart-money wallets and 2 well-known traders among the wallets that traded it
Every launch read, with what it found (8)
Funder seen bundling before (no confirmed rugs): 5aAHxpC9... seen bundling 13 other token(s), 0 confirmed rugs
Same-slot buys detected: 13/13 buyers, 15.9% supply, 5.8 SOL, entered 0.0s after launch
Closed-loop proceeds hub: 5 cluster wallets routed sell proceeds to BeU2cV…z1tr (~5.603 SOL) — one operator behind 'independent' wallets
Funding unresolved: 9/13 wallets
Single funder controls significant supply: 62kSnvef... holds 14.3% supply via 1 buyer(s)
Funder profits at low MC: 62kSnvef... breakeven ~36 SOL MC (14.3% supply, 5.1 SOL invested)
Scam wallet flagged BUT Trapped/Stuck — reduced risk: Pushed by actors with @ddddddd8a (established pattern of 76 rug(s))
All wallets <1 day old — disposable rug infrastructure
Deeper reads· beta
Could the launch group get out?
Still being tuned. Read the sections above first.
The launch group is trapped: selling would crash their own exit.
No flow read in the last two hours.
Get the next call on Telegram — every alert, 30 minutes after members. The moment it fires, $99 a month.
Check another one
Paste any contract address on Solana or Robinhood Chain.
Socials & X
Who's talking about it?
11 repeat-poster accounts. Posted between 22:30 and 22:40 UTC:
Record = how that account's earlier calls went; “none yet” until it has enough scored calls. Who posts is attention, not a reason to buy.
We search X for the full contract address, never the ticker, and sample it: a post we did not see is not proof nobody posted it.