$WOOD

The setup, and what would break it

It is holding its shape — the pool is flat at $462K once price is accounted for, and $248K traded over the day.

The case for $WOOD: there is a story here but the evidence behind it is thin.

Breaks if: This only becomes a case if they publish the contract address on their own site — until then there is nothing to invalidate; The pool is $462K today — if that shrinks while the price holds, the liquidity providers are leaving and the exit gets narrower than it looks.; Below $1.87M it has given up the 10% of its own peak that our replay treats as the line where holders stop coming back..

Where the money went

• Liquidity was seeded straight from the deployer's wallet, so no supply passed through the contract to be skimmed by a launch tax.

The liquidity lock

• 100% of the liquidity is neither burned nor locked — whoever holds it can withdraw it at any time.

Is there a product

• The documentation is real — it loads and it says something.
• The GitHub org is theirs and was last pushed to 0 days ago.
• The site never names this contract, so we could not confirm the two belong together.
• There is something on the site that behaves like an app, not just a page.

Third-party read

• No sell-blocking behaviour is reported against this contract, and no tax is taken on the way out. Nobody has run an actual test sell, so this is not proof you can leave.

What this read could not see

• Nobody has test-sold this token. Nothing was flagged, but that is not proof you can sell.
• We could not tell what tax is taken when you sell.
• Not checked yet: whether one group bought this together at launch. Not checked does not mean clean.
• We could not tell whether the early buyers have sold.
• No Telegram is linked from this token's listing, so its community size is unmeasured.
• No app contract found on the site to measure.
• The exit could not be modelled — the pool behind this token could not be read on this pass.