Robinhood Chain · chainId 4663 · deployer record

0x6fda…bb8c50 launches

This wallet has launched 50 tokens on Robinhood Chain, and 2 of them carry the same ticker — $HOOD.

2 of them are called $HOOD; 2 of them are called $HOODCAT GLOBAL; 2 of them are called $SAME DEV; 2 of them are called $WEVAMPSOL; 2 of them are called $PEPETO. The same name launched over again leaves the earlier ones behind by construction: whoever bought those is holding the ones that did not catch.

0 of the 50 still hold at least $1,000 of liquidity. Several launches is not evidence of anything on its own — this is the record, not a verdict.

Wallet 0x6fda94aceedc5a97171469a8873d00fb9983bb8c

Every token this wallet launched

TokenLaunchedLiquidityOur scan
$HOODfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$HOODCAT GLOBALyall nnever seeen a dev like MEfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$SapoEl Sapo Pepefirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$TRAINFreight Trainfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$PETIXfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$SAME DEVSAME DEV AS SOL OMGfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$SuitCatfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$CHONKSThe Chonksfirst seen UNKNOWN structural risk
$PEPrice-to-Earnings Ratiofirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$GMgreen morningfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$FREE WATCH599k ON SOL????first seen MEDIUM structural risk
$PEPEfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$CATBRAINfirst seen UNKNOWN structural risk
$Coinhoodfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$FLIPPINGtomcatCORRECT PAIRfirst seen LOW structural risk
$CHURROfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$tomcatfirst seen LOW structural risk
$vladtenderVlad Tenderfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$hoodCatwifHoodfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$PIKAMOONfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$APUfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$BEPEfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$Ozzyfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$HOODCAT GLOBALyall nnever seeen a dev like MEfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$REPERobot Pepefirst seen UNKNOWN structural risk
$PEPEGGfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$CHIPBlue Chipfirst seen UNKNOWN structural risk
$UNCfirst seen UNKNOWN structural risk
$PHILSGOODPhils good manfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$SAME DEVSAME DEV AS SOL OMGfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$JEETEVVlad Jeetevfirst seen UNKNOWN structural risk
$WEVAMPSOLDEV RUNNNINNGfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$Groyperfirst seen UNKNOWN structural risk
$GPfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$PEPETOfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$Musk-SanElon Musk-Sanfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$ARTCATfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$TROLLHOODfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$a secmaking a beat rn gimmefirst seen UNKNOWN structural risk
$Koafirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$cook of night nbsWATCH THIS BOUNCEfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$lets do itttLESSDOIITTTTfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$GENNYREADAnthropic Catfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$WEVAMPSOLDEV RUNNNINNGfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$CPepeClown Pepefirst seen UNKNOWN structural risk
$COOKcookwarefirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$HOODCATfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$PEPETOfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$willpaydexHooded Pepefirst seen MEDIUM structural risk
$CULTRobinhood Cultfirst seen MEDIUM structural risk

How to read this

A launch count is a fact, not a finding. What makes a record worth reading is the shape of it: the same ticker launched twice is one operator spraying a name until one catches; a dozen launches in an hour is tooling, not a project; a wallet whose earlier tokens all still trade is a different story from one whose earlier tokens are all at zero. The scans linked above hold the evidence behind each — a clean read is evidence, not a recommendation.

Cite this

PumpPill, “Robinhood Chain deployer record: 0x6fda…bb8c, as of 2026-09-23 (UTC). https://www.pumppill.org/rh/deployer/0x6fda94aceedc5a97171469a8873d00fb9983bb8c

Built from PumpPill’s own index of Robinhood Chain (chainId 4663): the launchpad event log and every token we have indexed, joined to our stored scans. Counts only — we do not publish a win rate, because a record of tokens that crossed a level has no losers in the denominator.