Robinhood Chain · chainId 4663 · deployer record
0xb47e…bdc110 launches
This wallet has launched 10 tokens on Robinhood Chain.
0 of the 10 still hold at least $1,000 of liquidity. Several launches is not evidence of anything on its own — this is the record, not a verdict.
0xb47e44cea9ac94e79808396f9b9ca3f5d471bdc1Every token this wallet launched
| Token | Launched | Liquidity | Our scan |
|---|---|---|---|
| $V4CATv4 cat | first seen | — | LOW structural risk |
| $ALCHEMY | first seen | — | LOW structural risk |
| $Lh4Lab h4 | first seen | — | MEDIUM structural risk |
| $GBGapB | first seen | — | MEDIUM structural risk |
| $HSTRhood strategy | first seen | — | MEDIUM structural risk |
| $Lg1Lab g1 | first seen | — | UNKNOWN structural risk |
| $Lde1Lab de1 | first seen | — | LOW structural risk |
| $GAGapA | first seen | — | MEDIUM structural risk |
| $Lde4Lab de4 | first seen | — | MEDIUM structural risk |
| $IBMi buy memes | first seen | — | MEDIUM structural risk |
How to read this
A launch count is a fact, not a finding. What makes a record worth reading is the shape of it: the same ticker launched twice is one operator spraying a name until one catches; a dozen launches in an hour is tooling, not a project; a wallet whose earlier tokens all still trade is a different story from one whose earlier tokens are all at zero. The scans linked above hold the evidence behind each — a clean read is evidence, not a recommendation.
Cite this
PumpPill, “Robinhood Chain deployer record: 0xb47e…bdc1”, as of 2026-09-23 (UTC). https://www.pumppill.org/rh/deployer/0xb47e44cea9ac94e79808396f9b9ca3f5d471bdc1
Built from PumpPill’s own index of Robinhood Chain (chainId 4663): the launchpad event log and every token we have indexed, joined to our stored scans. Counts only — we do not publish a win rate, because a record of tokens that crossed a level has no losers in the denominator.