Robinhood Chain · chainId 4663 · deployer record
0xfdc8…b6897 launches
This wallet has launched 7 tokens on Robinhood Chain, and 2 of them carry the same ticker — $COPPERHEAD.
2 of them are called $COPPERHEAD. The same name launched over again leaves the earlier ones behind by construction: whoever bought those is holding the ones that did not catch.
0 of the 7 still hold at least $1,000 of liquidity. Several launches is not evidence of anything on its own — this is the record, not a verdict.
0xfdc8f0113fe3a10d2db1788c4039604dd626b689Every token this wallet launched
| Token | Launched | Liquidity | Our scan |
|---|---|---|---|
| $COPPERHEADCopperheadOS | first seen | — | MEDIUM structural risk |
| $PETIX | first seen | — | MEDIUM structural risk |
| $COPPERHEADCopperheadOS | first seen | — | MEDIUM structural risk |
| $OAIOwlAlligatorIguana | first seen | — | MEDIUM structural risk |
| $HUNTINGDONEarl of Huntingdon | first seen | — | MEDIUM structural risk |
| $MUSEWORLD | first seen | — | UNKNOWN structural risk |
| $SHARKSTUFF | first seen | — | LOW structural risk |
How to read this
A launch count is a fact, not a finding. What makes a record worth reading is the shape of it: the same ticker launched twice is one operator spraying a name until one catches; a dozen launches in an hour is tooling, not a project; a wallet whose earlier tokens all still trade is a different story from one whose earlier tokens are all at zero. The scans linked above hold the evidence behind each — a clean read is evidence, not a recommendation.
Cite this
PumpPill, “Robinhood Chain deployer record: 0xfdc8…b689”, as of 2026-09-24 (UTC). https://www.pumppill.org/rh/deployer/0xfdc8f0113fe3a10d2db1788c4039604dd626b689
Built from PumpPill’s own index of Robinhood Chain (chainId 4663): the launchpad event log and every token we have indexed, joined to our stored scans. Counts only — we do not publish a win rate, because a record of tokens that crossed a level has no losers in the denominator.